Apple Potentially Owes Workers over $60 Million Due to off the Clock Security Screenings

Apple Store

12,000 Apple retail workers in California have scored a recent victory in court. U.S. District Judge William Alsup ruled in the worker’s favor after arguing that Apple owes them unpaid wages and damages for having them work off the clock while undergoing security screenings.

In their argument the retail workers describe Apple making them clock out before going through security screening which involved having their bags checked daily. The workers claim that the time they spend on theses screenings  accrued to about 90 minutes of unpaid work each week. Based on the case filings the damages that Apple could end up owing is currently estimated to be around $60 million.

The history of this lawsuit goes back to 2013 when the class action lawsuit was first filed. This lawsuit came as a response to the 2012 California Supreme Court ruling that required employers to pay their workers for the time spent in security screenings.

Initially, the lawsuit was dismissed back in 2015 after the Judge ruled that since workers were not required to bring bags and other items that would need to be screened then they were not under the company’s control at the time.

However, on February 2020 the California Supreme Court released an opinion stating that Apple must pay their workers for the time they were made to be off the clock and still be made to go through security screenings. Thus, the California Supreme Court’s opinion highly influenced the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision  to overturn the initial dismissal  in September of 2020. These events eventually led Apple retail workers to gain their recent victory in court.

Going forward Judge Alsup has granted Apple the opportunity to discover the amount of damage owed through a series in mini-trials. Therefore, Apple’s lawyers at DLA Piper can identify which individuals in the class action lawsuit either never waited any time to go though security screening or if any individuals spent time classified as too minor and trivial at these security screenings for it to be compensated.

Judge Alsup, however, also made it clear that in these series of mini-trials Apple cannot ask worker’s to submit claim forms with every detailed number of times they spent going through security screening while off the clock. Instead, Judge Alsup said that workers can only give an estimate of this time waiting to be screened especially since a lot of the claims are nearly a decade old.

In a statement Judge Alsup said “I’m not going to require the claimants to figure out every day they stood in line and how long they stood in line; if they gave dates, they would not be telling the truth,” Alsup said. “Apple is just out of luck on that point.”

Source: WestlawToday

Valiant Law is Southern California’s Premier Law Firm for Employment Law. Our dedicated and highly experienced attorneys can help you with a variety of legal needs. What sets us apart is not only our experience and our dedication, but also our passion for seeing our clients’ legal needs sufficiently met. Contact us today for a free consultation.

Related Posts
  • $41M Verdict against Kaiser Permanente highlights the Importance of protecting employee rights Read More
  • Student Files Lawsuit Against Claremont Unified School District, Claims Inadequate Protection from Bullying Incidents Read More
  • Charlie Munger, Prominent Attorney and Investor, 1924-2023 Read More